5.4 Initial Child Protection Conferences
5.4 Initial Child Protection Conference
Contents
- Purpose of Initial Child Protection Conference
- When an Initial Child Protection Conference must be Convened
- Timing of Initial Child Protection Conferences
- Who Should Attend
- Quorate Conferences
- Enabling Parental Participation
- Pre-birth Child Protection Conferences
- Role of the Social Worker
- Responsibilities of the Social Worker before the Conference
- Role of All Agencies
- Role of the Conference Chair before Conference
- Criteria for Excluding Parents or Restricting their Participation
- Enabling Children’s Participation
- Support to the Child After the Conference
- Reports to Conference
- Responsibilities of Other Professionals
- The Decision Making Process
- Categories of Abuse or Neglect
- If a Child Requires a Child Protection Plan
- Quality Assurance
- Complaints and Representations
- Record Keeping of Child Protection Conferences
- Decision Letter
- Leaflets for Parents, Carers, Children and Young People
- Purpose of Initial Child Protection Conference
1.1 | The Initial Child Protection Conference brings together family members, the child (when appropriate), supporters / advocates and those professionals most involved with the child and family to share and assess information following a Section 47 Enquiry and to formulate an agreed plan of management and services, with the child’s safety and welfare as its paramount aim. |
1.2 | Within this, the tasks are to:
|
- When an Initial Child Protection Conference must be Convened
2.1 | An Initial Child Protection Conference must be convened when it is believed that a child is suffering or likely to suffer Significant Harm. |
2.2 | The conference must consider all the children in the household, even if concerns are only being expressed about one child. |
2.3 | The decision to convene a Child Protection Conference will usually be made at the final Strategy Discussion/Meeting if more than one is held.
The decision to convene a child protection conference is made by the Social Worker’s Team Manager. The team manager must record their decision that the threshold is met to convene an initial case conference. |
2.4 | Where a senior manager from another agency requests that an Initial Child Protection Conference is convened, this request must be given serious consideration by Children’s Specialist Services and a response will be given in writing. Where an issue of professional difference is not resolved, the WSCB Multi-Agency Escalation Procedure should be followed |
2.5 | An Initial Child Protection Conference will usually be convened following a Strategy Discussion and Section 47 Enquiry, when it is believed that a child is suffering or is likely to suffer Significant Harm |
2.6 | The timing of this conference should depend on the urgency of the case and respond to the nature and severity of the harm they may be facing. The initial child protection conference should take place within 15 working days of a strategy discussion, or the strategy discussion at which section 47 enquiries were initiated if more than one has been held; The only exception to this would be where children moving across local authorities are on a child protection plan. In such cases please refer to chapter 10.2 of these procedures. The social worker must contact the Safeguarding Unit to plan arrangements for the conference, and provide details of who must attend within 5 working days of reaching the decision to request the conference. In addition the social worker must ensure that Liquid Logic is up to date to enable the conference to be initiated. A report must be provided 3 days prior to the conference, at the latest. |
2.7 | The Social Worker must then contact the Safeguarding Unit Duty Desk with as many potential conference dates as possible to agree a date of conference. |
2.8 | The Social Worker must ensure that the purpose and process of the child protection conference is explained to parents/young persons in advance of the Conference date. |
2.9 | The social worker should support parental attendance and support any necessary childcare arrangements. |
- Timing of Initial Child Protection Conferences
3.1 | The Initial Child Protection Conference must take place within 15 working days of the:
|
3.2 | The Initial Child Protection Conference should, when possible, be held before expiry of an Emergency Protection Order, or Powers of Police Protection, if further legal action is planned. |
3.3 | When a Child Assessment Order has been made, the conference should be held immediately on conclusion of examinations and assessments. |
3.4 | In the exceptional circumstance of some complex enquiries e.g. fabricated or induced illnesses, organised or institutional abuse or pre-birth assessments, the Initial Child Protection Conference could be delayed. For further detail, see:
Fabricated or Induced Illness Procedure Complex (Organised or Multiple) Abuse Procedure Section 7, Pre-Birth Child Protection |
3.5 | Any such delay must have written authorisation from the Children’s Specialist Services Team Manager (including reasons for the delay). The Team Manager must ensure that the risks to the child are monitored and action is taken to safeguard the child. The Social Worker must notify all key individuals involved of the delay. |
- Who Should Attend
See also Section 6, Enabling Parental Participation and Section 13, Enabling Children’s Participation | |
4.1 | The conference should consist of the smallest number of people consistent with effective case management, but the following should normally be invited:
|
4.2 | In addition, attendees may include those whose contribution relates to their professional expertise or responsibility for relevant services and should be limited to those with a need to know or who have a contribution to the task involved. |
4.3 | All professionals must consult their agency records and provide a signed report with copies for conference members (see Section 15, Reports to Conference (ICSF)). Key professionals that should provide reports include Health (where there has been a health assessment), schools, mental health services, drug and alcohol services, especially if not attending. Reports must be provided to the Safeguarding Unit in advance of the Conference. |
4.4 | Attendees may include:
|
4.5 | A professional observer can only attend with the prior consent of the Conference Chair and the family and must not take part in discussions or decision-making. There will only be 1 observer at any conference. |
4.6 | Professionals must provide a written report (see Section 15, Reports to Conferences (ICSF)). |
4.7 | Professionals who are invited but unable to attend for unavoidable reasons must:
|
4.8 | Electronic and Digital Recording
Advances in technology make the recording of meetings and other conversations e.g. via smart phones much more easily available to individual service-users. This may be simply because they wish to have a verbatim record of the conversation to refer back to, or because they have difficulties in following or recalling conversations. They may, however, seek to use the recording for other purposes such as admission into evidence in family court proceedings, or even for wider broadcast. This may arise in the context of child protection / safeguarding meetings, private law or public law proceedings, and may involve recording of conversations between parents, between parents and professionals, conversations between parents and children or discussions in meetings. The recording may take place overtly or covertly. There are no specific legal restrictions on the recording of face-to-face conversations, whether this is overt or covert. Thus, whilst good practice would suggest that advance consent should be sought for any planned recording, a blanket ban on recording is unlikely to be lawful. This is not a clear-cut area, and legal advice must be sought as appropriate. Practitioners should be mindful that covert recording may be taking place, and should endeavour to ensure that they do not make statements during ‘private’ conversations which they would not be prepared to hear produced as evidence in court. If the scale or style of recording is excessive, oppressive or disproportionate, then this may cross a threshold. For example, a parent recording their questioning of the child in a manner which is oppressive may in fact be evidence of possible emotional abuse of the child by that parent. Where the making of an audio or video record of a child protection/safeguarding meeting is proposed then this request should be considered by an LA senior manager who will consult participating agency managers and others as required, in the light of up-to-date local policy and legal advice. In the case of Child Protection Conferences the Conference Chair should determine the response in consultation with Conference members and/or by taking legal advice. For Core Group meetings the chair, often an LA Manager, or Lead social worker will determine the response. In considering the request by any party, it should be ensured that agreeing to such a request will not impact on the quality of the information-sharing and discussion, or compromise the decision-making with regard to the safeguarding of the child. The interests of the child must be the primary concern and confidentiality must be observed. Whilst the recording itself may well be legitimate, there may be restrictions on its use. If a party seeks to admit such material into court proceedings, then it is at the discretion of the court whether to allow this or not. Such evidence will only be admitted if it is relevant to the issues in the case and not, for example, in furtherance of a personal grievance by a parent against a social worker. The Data Protection Act 1998 does not prohibit data processing ‘by an individual only for the purposes of that individual’s personal, family or household affairs’ (Section 36). The scope of this in the context of recording is not clear. However, Jackson J in M v F (Covert Recording of Children) [2016] EWFC 29 expressed the view that the exemption is intended to protect normal domestic use, and would not cover the covert recording of individuals, and particularly children, for the purpose of evidence-gathering in family proceedings and Ward of Court proceedings. Wider distribution, for example, making such material available via the internet, may well be in contravention of the Data Protection Act 1998. It may also be the case that the recording may contain information (including possible ‘sensitive personal information’) relating to third parties, and the distribution of such information so as to enable those third parties to be identified is likely to be in breach of data protection provisions. If the issues in question are the subject of ongoing court proceedings, then there is also a possible contempt of court. Good Practice A clear process should be in place for dealing with requests to record meetings/conversations or for situations where it seems likely that covert recording is taking place or is likely to take place. It is preferable for this to be addressed with all service-users at an early stage, rather than waiting until the situation arises at the start of a meeting. The process should set out how the request should be made, who will consider the request and how far in advance of the meeting the request should be made. It should also make clear to the service-user the limitations upon the use of the recorded material, e.g. that it can only be used in relation to the ongoing family proceedings/ child protection processes and cannot be broadcast more widely. The service-user will preferably be invited to sign to indicate their agreement to and understanding of these limitations. It is important that each such request is considered on its own merits. If the decision-maker is minded to refuse the request, then legal advice should be sought. For Further Information see: |
- Quorate Conferences
5.1 | The primary principle for determining quoracy is that there should be sufficient agencies present to enable safe decisions to be made in the individual circumstances. |
5.2 | Normally, minimum representation is the Social Worker and 2 other agencies which have had direct contact with the child and family. |
5.3 | When a conference is inquorate it should not ordinarily proceed and in such circumstances, the Conference Chair must ensure that either:
|
5.4 | In exceptional circumstances the Conference Chair may decide to proceed with the conference despite lack of agency representation. This would be relevant when:
|
5.5 | When an inquorate conference is held, an early review Conference must be arranged. |
- Enabling Parental Participation
6.1 | All parents and persons with Parental Responsibility (including absent parents, parents who do not have day to day care of the child) must be invited to conferences (unless exclusion is justified as described below). Parents must be encouraged to contribute to conferences; usually by attending, unless it is likely to prejudice the welfare of the child (see Section 12, Criteria for Excluding Parents or Restricting Their Participation) |
6.2 | If parents / carers feel unable to attend the conference, alternative means must be provided for them to communicate with the Conference Chair – see Section 11, Role of the Conference Chair Before Conference |
- Pre-birth Child Protection Conferences
7.1 | A pre-birth conference is an Initial Child Protection Conference concerning an unborn child. Such a conference has the same status and purpose and must be conducted in a comparable manner to an Initial Child Protection Conference. | |
7.2 | Pre-birth conferences should always be convened where there is a need to consider if a Child Protection Plan is required. | |
7.3 | This decision will usually follow from a pre-birth Social Work Assessment of Needs and Strengths and a conference should be held: | |
a. | Where a pre-birth assessment gives rise to concerns that an unborn child may be suffering or likely to suffer Significant Harm; | |
b. | Where a previous child has died or been removed from parent/s as a result of Significant Harm; | |
c. | Where a child is to be born into a family or household which already have children who are the subject of a Child Protection Plan; | |
d. | Where a person known to pose a risk to children resides in the household or is known to be a regular visitor; | |
e. | Other risk factors to be considered are:
|
|
7.4 | All agencies involved with the expectant mother should consider the need for an early referral to Children’s Specialist Services so that assessments are undertaken and family support services provided as early as possible in the pregnancy. | |
Timing of Pre-Birth Conferences | ||
7.5 | The pre-birth conference should take place as soon as practical, so as to allow as much time as possible for planning support for the baby and family. | |
7.6 | Where there is a known likelihood of a premature birth, the conference should be held earlier. | |
Attendance | ||
7.7 | The key agencies involved in the delivery of the child must attend the conference. It is important that this conference makes an informed decision about whether or not the child should remain in the parents’ care and draws up protection plans that link to either decision. | |
7.8 | In addition to those who normally attend an Initial Child Protection Conference, midwifery, relevant neo-natal and Children’s Centres services must be invited. | |
7.9 | Parents or carers should be invited as they would be to other Child Protection Conferences and should be fully involved in plans for the child’s future. | |
Decision | ||
7.10 | The decision to make a child the subject of a Child Protection Plan is one made by the conference collectively. Any dissent should be noted and the Chair should support through decision making. The chair should determine which category of abuse or neglect the child has suffered or is likely to suffer. If a decision is made that the child requires a Child Protection Plan, the main cause for concern must determine the category of abuse or neglect under which the decision is made and the Child Protection Plan must be outlined to commence prior to the birth of the baby. | |
7.11 | The Core Group must be established and meet if at all possible prior to the birth to agree the discharge plan, and certainly prior to the baby’s return home after a hospital birth. | |
7.12 | If a decision is made that the unborn child requires a Child Protection Plan, this should be recorded, including the child’s name (or ‘baby’, if not known) and expected date of delivery, pending the birth. The senior midwife must notify the Lead Social Worker of the name and correct birth date following the birth. If this takes place out of hours, then the senior midwife must inform the Emergency Duty Team, who will then notify the Lead Social Worker by the beginning of the next working day. The Lead Social Worker must then ensure that the name and correct birth date is notified to the Manager of the Child Protection Unit following the birth. | |
Timing of Review Conference | ||
7.13 | The first Child Protection Review Conference will be scheduled to take place within 1 month of the child’s birth. |
- Role of the Social Worker
8.1 | The Social Worker must facilitate the constructive involvement of the parents by ensuring in advance of the conference that they are given sufficient information and practical support to make a meaningful contribution. |
8.2 | Invitations for the parent/s to attend the conference must be conveyed verbally by the Social Worker and confirmed in writing. |
8.3 | The Social Worker must explain to parents / carers the purpose of the meeting, who will attend, the way in which it will operate, the purpose and meaning of a decision that a child requires a Child Protection Plan. |
8.4 | Provision must be made to ensure that visually or hearing impaired or otherwise disabled parents / carers are enabled to participate, including whether they need assistance with transport to enable their attendance. |
8.5 | Preparation must also include consideration of childcare arrangements to enable the attendance of parents. |
8.6 | Those for whom English is not a first language must be offered and provided with an interpreter, if required. A family member should not be expected to act as an interpreter of spoken or signed language. |
8.7 | Written information must be left with the parents regarding conferences, the right to bring a friend, supporter (including an advocate) or solicitor (in the role of supporter), details of any local advice and advocacy services and the Child Protection Conferences Appeals Procedure. |
8.8 | If parents do not wish to attend the conference they must be provided with full opportunities to contribute their views. The Social Worker must facilitate this by:
|
- Responsibilities of the Social Worker before the Conference
General Responsibilities | |
9.1 | The Social Worker is responsible for the following:
|
- Role of All Agencies
- Use simple jargon-free language appropriate to age and culture of each individual;
- Be open and honest about concerns and professionals’ responsibilities, plans and limitations;
- Allow individuals time to absorb professional concerns and processes;
- Distinguish between personal feelings, values, prejudices and beliefs, and professional roles and responsibilities and seek and use supervision to check achievement of this;
- Always acknowledge errors, failures or oversights and the distress caused to families;
- Explicit consideration should be given to the potential of conflict between family members and possible need for children or adults to speak without other family members present.
- Role of the Conference Chair before Conference
11.1 | The Conference chair is an independent professional who is accountable to the Director of Children’s Social Care through their line manager. Their responsibilities include:
|
11.2 | The Conference Chair must not have any operational or line management responsibility for the case. |
11.3 | The Conference Chair must ensure that at least 3 agencies are represented at the conference unless agreed otherwise (see Section 5, Quorate Conferences) |
11.4 | The Conference Chair is responsible for ensuring that conferences are conducted in an anti-discriminatory manner, ensuring that everyone uses unambiguous language. |
Before the Conference | |
11.5 | The responsibilities of the Conference Chair in relation to decision-making about restricting parents’ participation and not inviting children are set out in Section 12, Criteria for Excluding Parents or Restricting their Participation and Section 13, Enabling Children’s Participation. |
11.6 | Before the Conference begins, the Conference Chair should meet the parents and child, if they have attended, to ensure that they understand the purpose of the conference and how it will be conducted. Where necessary, interpreters or translators must be made available to facilitate family participation. |
At the Start of the Conference | |
11.7 | At the start of the conference, the Conference Chair must:
|
11.8 | If the parent/s or the child brings a friend / supporter or advocate, the Conference Chair will need to clarify the supporter’s role, ensuring that any solicitor who attends in this role is clear that s/he may support parent/s, clarify information but may not cross-examine any contributor. Individual notes are to be discouraged as the minutes of the conference are the agreed record of the conference. |
During the Conference | |
11.9 | The Conference Chair must ensure that:
|
- Criteria for Excluding Parents or Restricting their Participation
12.1 | In circumstances where it may be necessary to exclude 1 or more family members from part or all of a conference the request to exclude or restrict a parent’s participation must be discussed with the Conference Chair and confirmed by email and recorded on ICS if possible at least 3 days in advance. |
12.2 | The agency concerned must indicate which of the grounds it believes is met and the information or evidence the request is based upon. The Conference Chair must consider the representation carefully and may need legal advice. |
12.3 | The Conference Chair must make a decision according to the following criteria:
|
12.4 | Exclusion at one Conference is not reason enough in itself for exclusion at further Conferences. |
12.5 | If the Conference Chair excludes or restricts participation of a parent, the decision must be communicated in writing to the following people:
|
12.6 | The letter must be signed by the Conference Chair and set out:
|
12.7 | Any exclusion period must be for the minimum duration necessary and the decision to exclude must be clearly recorded in the Conference minutes. |
12.8 | Those excluded must be provided with a copy of the Social Worker’s report to the conference, with redaction of any sections that are not relevant or appropriate to the person excluded, and be provided with the opportunity to have their views recorded and presented to the conference. |
12.9 | If, in planning a conference, it becomes clear to the Conference Chair that there may be conflict of interests between the children and parents, the conference must be planned so that the welfare of the child can remain paramount. |
12.10 | This may mean arranging for the child and parents to participate in separate parts of the conference and make separate waiting arrangements. |
12.11 | It may also become clear in the course of a conference, that its effectiveness will be seriously impaired by the presence of the parent/s. In these circumstances, the Conference Chair may ask them to leave. |
12.12 | If a parent is on bail, or subject to an active Police investigation, it is the responsibility of the Conference Chair to ensure that the Police can fully present their information and views and also that the parents participate as fully as circumstances allow. |
12.13 | The decision of the Conference Chair over matters of exclusion is final. |
12.14 | When a parent/carer attends only part of a conference as a result of exclusion, s/he must receive the record of the conference. The Conference Chair must decide if the entire record is provided or only that part attended by the excluded parent/carer. |
12.15 | On rare occasions, as specified in the Fabricated and Induced Illnesses Procedure, it may be appropriate to convene a conference without informing parents. |
- Enabling Children’s Participation
Involving the Child | |
13.1 | The child must be kept informed and involved throughout Section 47 Enquiries and, if their level of understanding is sufficient, must be invited to contribute to the conference; which can include attendance. In practice, the appropriateness of enabling an individual child to attend must be assessed in advance and relevant arrangements made to facilitate attendance at all or part of the conference. |
13.2 | All children aged 10 or over must be offered advocacy through a social worker regardless of whether they wish to attend the Conference. |
13.3 | ‘Child Protection Conferences – Information for Children and Young People’ must be given to and discussed with every child of sufficient understanding. |
Criteria for Attendance of Child at Conference | |
13.4 | The key considerations are:
|
13.5 | The test of ‘sufficient understanding’, is partly a function of age and partly the child’s capacity to understand. A guiding principle is that usually a child of 10 or over should be invited to attend and a child under 10 should not. |
13.6 | In order to establish her/his wish with respect to attendance, the child must be first provided with a full and clear explanation of the purpose, conduct, membership of the Conference and potential provision of an advocate or support person (‘Child Protection Conferences – Information for Children and Young People’). |
13.7 | Written information translated into the appropriate language must be provided to those able to read and an alternative medium e.g. tape, offered those who cannot read. |
13.8 | Consideration must be given to the views of, and impact on parent/s of their child’s proposed attendance. |
13.9 | Consideration must be given to the impact of the Conference on the child e.g. where it will be impossible to ensure they are kept apart from a parent who may be hostile and/or attribute responsibility onto them. |
Decision that a Child should or should not attend | |
13.10 | A decision about whether to invite the child must be made in advance of the Conference by the Conference Chair, in consultation with the Social Worker, her/his manager and any other relevant professional. |
13.11 | In making this decision, the views of the parents and of professionals who know the child should be taken into consideration. |
13.12 | Any decision that a child should not attend the Conference must be made using the following criteria:
|
13.13 | It is not always appropriate for a child under 10 to attend and attendance by pre-school children is not permitted. It is the responsibility of the Social Worker or the child’s key worker to assist the parents in arranging childcare. |
13.14 | The decision of the Conference Chair is final. |
Indirect Participation | |
13.15 | If it is decided that the child should not attend, it is essential that the wishes and feelings of the child are fully represented. Indirect contributions from a child could include a pre-meeting with the Conference Chair or representation by an advocate. Other indirect methods are suggested in the ‘Child Protection Conferences – Information for Children and Young People’. |
Direct Participation | |
13.16 | If the decision is that the child is to attend the conference, then the Social Worker must:
|
13.17 | If the child is attending the Conference, it is the responsibility of the Conference Chair to:
|
13.18 | If the child is attending the Conference, it is the responsibility of all professionals to:
|
13.19 | It is essential that planning takes place prior to the conference to ensure that the practical arrangements are suitable. The Social Worker must in discussion with the Conference Chair:
|
13.20 | The advocate will have been arranged by the Social Worker in consultation with the child and agreed with the Conference Chair. |
13.21 | A supporter’s only role at the conference is to support and accompany the child. The supporter should be an adult and they should be fully briefed on the principles of confidentiality. |
13.22 | The role of the supporter is to enable the child to put her or his point of view, not to take an adversarial position or cross-examine the participants. |
13.23 | If the supporter identified would otherwise be a participant at the conference e.g. a teacher then another agency / organisation representative must be identified and attend to present the report and be involved in the decision-making process. |
13.24 | The supporter is not and cannot be a member of the Core Group nor can s/he make a recommendation about whether a child requires a Child Protection Plan. |
- Support to the Child After the Conference
14.1 | The Social Worker must meet with the child as soon as possible after the conference to:
|
- Reports to Conference (ICSF)
15.1 | The Social Worker must provide to the conference a typed, signed and dated written Initial Child Protection Conference report (using) including a chronology of significant events, which must be endorsed and counter signed by the Practice or Team Manager 48 hours before conference. |
15.2 | Information on all children in the household must be provided and the report must be clear about which children are the subjects of the conference. |
15.3 | For an Initial Child Protection Conference, the report must have regard to the outcomes of the Common Assessment, the Social Work Assessment of Needs and Strengths, and must include:
|
15.4 | The report must be provided to parents and older children (to the extent that it is believed to be in their interests) at least 3 working days in advance of the Initial Child Protection Conference to enable any factual inaccuracies to be identified, amended and areas of disagreement noted. Comments or suggestions made by the child/parents as a result of seeing the report must be included or conveyed verbally to the conference. |
15.5 | In exceptional circumstances when confidential information cannot be shared with the child or parent/s beforehand, the Social Worker must seek guidance from her/his manager, who may wish to consult the Conference Chair. |
15.6 | When necessary, the reports must be translated into the relevant language or medium, taking account of the language and any sensory or learning difficulties of the child / parents. |
15.7 | The report must be provided to the Conference Chair at least three working days prior to the Initial Child Protection Conference. |
- Responsibilities of Other Professionals
General Responsibilities | |
16.1 | All participants are responsible for the following:
|
Reports to Conference | |
16.2 | All agencies that have participated in a Common Assessment, Social Work Assessment of Needs and Strengths and Section 47 Enquiry or have relevant information about the child and/or family members should make this information available to the conference in a report written on the agreed template. |
16.3 | The report must include details of the agency’s involvement with the child and family, and information concerning the agency’s knowledge of the child’s developmental needs, capacity of the parents to meet the needs of their child within their family and environmental context. |
16.4 | Agency representatives attending conferences must confer with their colleagues before preparing the report to make sure it contains all relevant and available information and bring sufficient copies of the report (legible and signed) to the conference. |
16.5 | The reports must make it clear which child/ren are the subject of the conference, but address any known circumstances of all children in the household. |
16.6 | When necessary, the reports must be translated into the relevant language or medium, taking account of the language and any sensory or learning difficulties of the child / parents. |
16.7 | The reports must be shared with the parents and the child (if of sufficient understanding) before the conference, in the same way as described for Social Workers. |
16.8 | Such reports must also be made available to the Conference Chair, when possible, 24 hours in advance of the conference. |
16.9 | When agency representatives are unable to attend the conference, they must ensure that a written report is made available to the conference, through the Conference Chair, or that a colleague attends in their place. |
- The Decision Making Process
17.1 | The questions to ask as part of the decision making process are:
The test for the likelihood of the child suffering Significant Harm in the future should be:
|
17.2 | If the criteria for Child Protection Plans are met, the child will become the subject of a Child Protection Plan. |
17.3 | The Conference Chair must ensure the decision is based on the views of all agencies represented at the conference and also take into account any written contributions that have been made. This must normally take place with the parents / carers present. Any dissent must be recorded in the conference minutes. All participating agencies at the conference have a responsibility to make a decision. |
17.4 | If parents/carers disagree with the decision, the Conference Chair must discuss the issue with them and explain their right to and the process for challenge. |
17.5 | Where a child has suffered, or is likely to suffer, Significant Harm in the future it is the local authority’s duty to consider the evidence and decide what, if any, legal action to take. The information presented to the Child Protection Conference should inform that decision-making process but it is for the local authority to consider whether it should initiate, for example, Care Proceedings. Where a child who is the subject of a Child Protection Plan becomes Looked After, the Child Protection Plan should form part of the child’s Care Plan. |
- Categories of Abuse or Neglect
18.1 | If the decision is that the child is at continuing risk of Significant Harm and in need of a Child Protection Plan, the Chair must determine under which category of abuse or neglect the decision is made. |
18.2 | For the categories, see Deciding and Recording that a Child should be Subject to a Child Protection Plan Procedure. |
18.3 | The category of abuse or neglect on which the decision is made must indicate to those making enquiries about the child the primary presenting concerns at the time the Child Protection Plan was made. |
18.4 | The need for a Child Protection Plan must be considered separately in respect of each child in the family or household. |
- If a Child Requires a Child Protection Plan
19.1 | If a decision is reached that a child requires a Child Protection Plan, the Conference Chair must ensure that:
|
19.2 | The Chair cannot commit resources in terms of recommendations until the Practice or Team Manager within the Children’s Service has been consulted. |
19.3 | In instances where a disparity arises between the minimum requirements specified by the Chair and resources, which are to be committed for any reason, this must be resolved within 3 days by the relevant District Manager. |
19.4 | In such an instance the Chair must immediately inform the Service Manager, Safeguarding Children Unit of the circumstances and issues. |
19.5 | When the Lead Social Worker finds it is not possible to implement aspects of the Child Protection Plan following the conference, s/he must follow the guidance as laid down in Child Protection Review Conferences Procedure, Roles and Responsibility of the Practice or Team Manager and Lead Social Worker when the Child Protection Plan Cannot be Implemented. |
19.6 | In relation to other agencies, should a mutually agreed Child Protection Plan not be possible, the Chair must ensure that any dissenting views on aspects of the Plan are recorded in the minutes as well as the nature and purpose of any action they wish to take. These cases must then be referred by the Conference Chair. |
19.7 | If following a conference, any individual or agency is unable to implement the Child Protection Plan they must in consultation with their line manager decide on an alternative action and inform the Conference Chair, Lead Social Worker. This must then be further discussed at the Core Group and a revised Plan agreed. |
If a child does not require a Child Protection Plan | |
19.8 | If it is considered that the criteria for Child Protection Plans have not been reached, but the child is in need of help to promote her/his health or development, the Conference Chair must ensure that the conference draws up a Child in Need Plan and makes recommendations as appropriate to the relevant agencies to:
The date of the first Child in Need meeting will be agreed and set at the Conference. |
- Quality Assurance
20.1 | The Conference Chair has responsibility for ensuring consistently high standards of practice by encouraging inter-agency co-operation and identifying shortcomings in practice. In order to achieve this, the Conference Chair must:
|
Dissent from the Conference Decision | |
20.2 | If an agency does not agree with a decision or recommendation made at a conference, its dissent must be recorded in the minutes of the Conference. |
20.3 | When this occurs, the Social Worker must involve that agency in future decision-making and in the implementation of the Child Protection Plan. |
20.4 | If a professional concludes that a conference decision places a child at risk, s/he must seek advice from her/his Named or Designated or Lead Professional or manager. |
20.5 | Where the issue is not resolved, follow the WSCB Multi-Agency Escalation Procedure. |
20.6 | If parents / carers disagree with the conference decision, the Chair must further discuss their concerns and explain the Child Protection Conferences Appeals Procedure. |
20.7 | Parents, anyone with Parental Responsibility for the child or young person, or the child or young person concerned (when of sufficient age and understanding) have the right to apply for an independent review on certain grounds. See Section 21, Complaints and Representations below. |
20.8 | The application must be addressed to the Service Manager, Safeguarding Children Unit. |
20.9 | Potential applicants must be informed of their right to apply by a leaflet explaining the process and by the Conference Chair. The Social Worker must also be available to supply information and clarify the procedure. |
- Complaints and Representations
21.1 | Each consultant constituent agency of the Wirral Safeguarding Children Board operates and publicises its own complaints procedures, which includes an independent element. |
21.2 | Complaints and representation specific to one professional are therefore to be addressed to the particular agency involved, whether arising during the investigation or child protection conference. |
21.3 | The Independent Conference Chair must ensure that complaints/representations arising at conference are directed to the attention of the agency or agencies as appropriate.
Any complaints about the conduct of the chair should be made to the Quality Assurance/Safeguarding Manager, who will refer the matter to Wirral LSCB |
- Record Keeping of Child Protection Conferences
22.1 | The record of the Conference is a crucial working document for all relevant professionals and the family. The record produced is not a verbatim minute but is a summary of the main facts and issues, which are raised and addressed at the conference. |
22.2 | All reports presented at conference will be referred to as appendices with the express permission of the author. |
22.3 | All Initial and Review Conferences must be recorded by a dedicated person whose sole task within the Conference is to provide a written record of proceedings in a consistent format. |
22.4 | Conference records must include:
|
22.5 | The record of the conference, signed by the Conference Chair, must be sent to all professionals who attended, or were invited, within 10 working days of the conference, and to relevant family members within 15 days. The Social Worker’s report must be attached to the record. |
22.6 | Requests for amendments must be made in writing within one week of receipt of the conference record so that they can be circulated with a covering letter requesting that the recipient attach the amendment to the original record. |
22.7 | Amendments must be circulated where information recorded is factually incorrect or where the wording used substantially alters the meaning of what was said. This must be agreed with the conference chair. |
22.8 | A copy of the draft outline Child Protection Plan must be passed to the Lead Social Worker in time for the first Core Group meeting and posted to parents who attended the conference. This Plan may be modified subsequently by the Chair and the final version must be circulated as part of the record of the Initial Child Protection Conference. The Conference Chair must inform the Lead Social Worker in writing of any significant changes made. |
22.9 | Copies of the conference record for parents who did not attend the conference and children/young people must always be sent to the Social Worker who must give and discuss them with the parent/child within 5 days of receipt from the Safeguarding Children Unit, i.e. within 15 working days from the date of the conference. |
22.10 | The Chair may decide, on the advice of conference members that parents will not be given a copy of the conference record and must reach agreement on the most appropriate method of informing them of the details of the conference, through an appropriately worded letter or verbally by the key worker. |
22.11 | Supporters of family members who attend conference will not receive a copy of the record. It is expected that the family member concerned will share their copy of the record with their supporter if they wish. |
22.12 | Family members invited in their own right, for example, grandparents, must receive a copy of the record. |
22.13 | When a child has attended a Child Protection Conference, the Social Worker must arrange to see her/him and arrange to discuss relevant sections of the conference record. |
22.14 | Consideration must be given to whether a child should be given copies of the conference record. They may be supplied to a child’s legal representative on request. |
22.15 | When parents and/or the child/ren have a sensory disability or if English is not their first language, steps must be taken to ensure that they can understand and make full use of the conference record. |
22.16 | Conference records are confidential and should not be passed to third parties without the consent of either the Conference Chair or order of the Court. |
22.17 | When there are ongoing criminal proceedings, there should be consultation between the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to the sharing of Conference records. |
22.18 | The Chair must, where appropriate and subject to legal advice, give permission on behalf of conference members for the record to be used in Court proceedings by parents and their legal representatives in such matters as divorce, domestic violence disputes and Section 8 Orders (Children Act 1989). |
22.19 | The recipient agencies and professionals must retain the Conference record in accordance with their record retention policy. |
- Decision Letter
23.1 | The social worker must forward a letter to the parents and child/ren confirming the decisions and recommendations of the Conference. |
23.2 | The decision letter must be dispatched to parents / carers and other participants within 2 working days of the conference. This gives details of whether the child/ren was made subject of a Child Protection Plan, the name of the Lead Social Worker and the recommendations of the conference. |
Leaflets for Parents, Carers, Children and Young People
CP Conference Parent Carer’s Guide
CP Enquiries Parent Carer’s Guide
CP Young People’s Guide (older)
CP Young People’s Guide (younger)